Whoa it’s been a while. I’ve had to get the duster out and clean through a little, not to mention pull down a few cobwebs and extract the tumbleweeds, but here I am, with a new blog post. I could give you a million and one reasons why I’ve not posted many blog articles recently but in reality, I know you’re not fussed so I’ll just shut-up and get on with it! I was out shooting Orchids the other week when I met a couple who were very interested in what I was shooting. Long story short they invited me back to see the Bee Orchids and Fly orchid they had on their land. Having been shooting orchids all morning I had been experimenting with flash. Fortunately II had taken a small softbox with me - a PhotoFlex LiteDome XTC - while I find it too small a ‘box for really great portraits, it’s a very good size for macro lighting where you want to achieve nice soft light. The question is, why would you use flash? Well, contrary to popular belief, flash is incredibly useful in bright sunlight. In fact, I’d suggest if you get serious about it, you’re more likely to use flash during the day than you are at night. Here’s an example of a Pyramidal Orchid. The first shot has no flash, the second shot has flash. (Mouseover the image to see the second shot)
Now, you could say that the colours of the flower head have gone a bit in the second shot - they’re not quite as rich. However, with natural light only you’d have had precious little choice - to brighten the flower head the whole image would have got brighter and you have need to either up the ISO, open the aperture or keep the shutter open for longer - all of which would have been undesirable in this instance.... higher ISO = image noise, wider aperture = shallower depth of field and therefore less sharpness across flower head, longer shutter speed = much higher chance of the flower stem moving in the breeze. So the options were limited to flash, or.... flash!
In both shots, nothing has changed - the camera was set to manual with the shutter speed and aperture dialed in to capture the ambient light as I wanted. All I did was hold the softbox over the flower head and set flash exposure compensation (the flash was in ETTL) to -2/3rd stop to keep the light gentle. OK, so that’s some basic flash. Here’s a challenge question for you: Which of these two images was photographed using flash? (Mouseover to see the second image)
Sorry, it's an unfair question really - the answer is they both were. In both cases everything was the same with the exception of one variable. The shutter speed. In the first image the shutter speed was 1/80th sec in the second image it was 1/160th sec. What this has done is simply record one stop less ambient light making the background darker and helping the subject pop from it a little better. Essentially we have adjusted the flash:ambient ratio in the favour of the flash.
Now, from a ‘true-to-life’ perspective, the first shot looks more natural and for most uses this would be the better choice. But now we have a handle on using flash creatively we are into the realms of (and I hate to suggest this is art but I can’t think of a better word!) art. Modifying what the image looks like by adjusting your camera settings. Which you prefer is a matter of personal taste and will depend on the end use of your image.


Loading Poll...

